|
Description of Federal Requirements
[TOP]
The federal
regulation (483.12)
articulates rights that the resident has related to admission,
transfer, or discharge, some of the procedures facilities must
follow, and records they must keep. The definition of transfer
and discharge here applies to movement to a bed outside the
certified facility (including differently licensed beds in the
same physical plant), but does not apply to movement to a
different bed in the certified facility. (Those Intra-facility
transfers are discussed under
483.10, Resident Rights.)The rules
regarding transfer or discharge (a) establish the conditions
under which a resident may be transferred involuntarily,
including that the facility is closing, the resident has
improved so that he/she no longer needs the care, the facility
is unable to provide the resident with the necessary care, the
resident is a danger to self or others, and the resident has
failed to pay for care or (if supported by third parties,
including Medicaid) has failed to have the care paid for. The
federal rule establishes expectations for documentation
regarding transfers (including the reason), and written notice
to the residents of at least 30 days, unless the reason for
transfer is related to urgent medical needs of the resident or
health and safety of others. The written notice must include
the reasons for the transfer/discharge, the effective date, the
location of discharge or transfer, the right of appeal, and
notification of how to reach the long-term care ombudsman and/or
the appropriate Protection and Advocacy agency in the case of
individuals with developmental disabilities or persons who are
mentally ill. Further, the facility “must provide sufficient
preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and
orderly transfer or discharge from the facility.”
Another
section (b) of this regulation refers to bed holds and the
resident’s right to return to the nursing home after being
discharged for hospitals or therapeutic leaves. These policies
are determined in part by the State’s policy about how long
payment will be made to hold a bed for a resident after
discharge. In any case, the facility needs to clearly disclose
to the resident and family in writing the amount of time the bed
will be held, and its policies for readmission after that time
expires.
Under a
provision for “equal access to quality care (c) , the policies
that the facility develops for transfer, discharge, and
provision of all the services covered in the State Medicaid Plan
must be identical for all residents regardless of the resident’s
source of payment. The regulation also States that facilities
are not obliged to provide any services that are not under the
State plan. The facility may charge privately paying residents
any amount they chose for the services included in the State
plan and other services, but are subject to requirements for
disclosure in the Resident Rights regulation (483.10). The final
section (d) on Admission Rights articulates prohibits any
facility that accepts Medicaid or Medicare from requiring
residents to waive their rights to this coverage, prohibits
facilities to require guarantees of payment from a third party
as a condition of income, and prohibits the facility from
soliciting any gift or donation as a consideration of admission
or continued stay. The section also specifically states that
States “may apply stricter admissions standards under State or
local law to prohibit discrimination against individuals
entitled to Medicaid.
Under
483.10 (Resident Rights) some general rights are enunciate
that overlap with this regulation on admission, discharge, and
transfer rights, especially as regards written notice about
Medicaid and Medicare coverage.
Comparison of State Requirements
[TOP]
|
Using the sections on Comparisons of State
Regulations
a
Each narrative highlights how States
differ from Federal regulations on a specific topic.
a
Italics are used for signed NHRegsPlus
comments on the relevance of these variations for resident
autonomy, quality of life, or culture change.
a
Examples are illustrative not
comprehensive; always check specific State language.
a
See a
table with links to each State’s
regulatory language at the bottom of the page. |
|
|
NOTE: The examples below may not list all States
with similar language; always check your state for specifics
The large majority of States have some
provisions in excess of Federal regulations relating to admission,
transfer, and discharge rights. The exceptions are Connecticut,
District of Columbia, Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, Utah, and
Virginia).
Admissions
[TOP]
Admission
requirements going beyond federal rules include: iteration of the
State’s requirements for preadmission screenings; establishing reasons
for denial of admission; waiting list rules, including preferences on
wait lists; admission agreements; and requirements for special State
approval for residents below a specified age. Seven states (Illinois,
Indiana,
Maine,
Massachusetts,
Montana,
Oregon,
and Texas)
require all potential nursing home residents (not just those on
Medicaid) to undergo a preadmission screening. to determine that nursing
home placement is indeed an appropriate option for each resident.
Admission rules occasionally concern times of day or week when
admissions must be allowed or are prohibited. Also, in keeping with
current efforts of many States to divert residents from entering a
nursing home, some States mandate counseling on options. Examples
follow.
- Two states (Minnesota
and
New Jersey) require people who are denied admission to a
facility be informed of the reason for non-admission. New Jersey
statute mandates this notification and reasons for non-admittance in
writing to the resident or representative within 14 days of the
denial.
- New Mexico and
Wisconsin regulations state that admissions may not be limited
to weekdays but rather occur seven days a week. Additionally,
New Jersey prohibits transfers between 5:00 p.m. and 8:00 a. m.
except in the event of an emergency or with consent from the
residents or their representatives.
-
New Jersey and Washington regulations delineate the procedure
for maintaining a waiting list for admissions. New Jersey grants
preference to residents of a continuum of care community when a bed
is available, whereas Washington statutes allow preference to be
given to residents of a boarding home, independent living, or other
continuum of care facility owned by the same entity as the nursing
facility.
- Seven States
require that potential residents under specific ages be approved by
the State. Such approval is required for residents are under age 14
in Tennessee, under age 16 in Iowa and
Kansas, under age 18 in
Illinois,
Indiana, and
Wisconsin, and
under age 22 in
Massachusetts.
- Five States
(California,
Kansas,
Michigan,
Minnesota, and
Mississippi) require
admissions agreements between facilities and residents or their
representative. In California, the admission agreement requires the
use of a specific agreement form as the only allowable admission
agreement. This form includes an explicit statement in 12-point
type of the inability to waive a resident’s right to sue for a
violation of the resident bill of rights as a condition of
admission.
[NHRegsComments: These
California policies grew out of a study of admissions agreements
conducted by a California legal advocacy in the late 1980’s led by
Donna Ambrogio. This study reviewed hundreds of distinct admission
agreements, found that most were illegal, and recommended a standard
protocol for such agreements. ]
The admissions agreement in Kansas,
Michigan, Minnesota, and Mississippi involves a contract for
financial payment for services rendered by the nursing facility.
The Kansas agreement must indicate the statement of financial
responsibility in black type with no less than 12-point type.
-
Vermont
requires that all residents admitted to a facility receive Options
Counseling.
[NHRegsComments.
Such policies are consistent with State efforts to ensure that older
people consider community options before entering a nursing home and
that even those who are admitted receive the opportunity to learn
about community options and perhaps plan for a discharge.]
Transfers
[TOP]
More than half of
the States (Alaska,
Arkansas,
Delaware,
Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho,
Illinois,
Indiana,
Kansas,
Kentucky,
Maine,
Maryland,
Massachusetts,
Nevada,
New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma,
Pennsylvania,
Rhode
Island, South Carolina, South Dakota,
Texas,
Vermont, West Virginia,
Wisconsin, and Wyoming) mandate a transfer agreement between the nursing
facility and at least one hospital. The language usually states that
such agreements are to facilitate timely resident transfers and exchange
appropriate medical information. Maryland requires that the transfer
agreement designates responsibility for ensuring safe transportation and
care during transfer, securing residents’ belongings, and prompt
readmission to the skilled nursing facility.
Variations are
found regarding requirements for transfer and discharge notification.
Colorado mandates the notice of involuntary transfer be mailed to the
Ombudsman at the same time it is provided to the resident. Indiana also
requires a copy of notice for involuntary transfer/discharge be sent to
the long-term care ombudsman program in addition to the person or agency
responsible for resident’s placement in the facility, resident’s
physician, and the regional office of the division of disability, aging
and rehabilitative services if the person has a developmental
disability. The notice in
Maine must include a statement of the right
for a resident to represent his or herself, choose a lawyer, family
member, friend or other spokesperson speak on their behalf.
Maryland
requires that the notice of transfer or discharge must include a
statement regarding the right a resident to consult an attorney. In
Missouri, the notice must be given to the resident, his/her
representative, and at least one family member; when no family member is
known to the facility, a copy of the notice must be sent to the state
Ombudsman’s office. The state and ombudsman must be informed five
business days prior to a non-emergency involuntary transfer in
Tennessee.
Texas statute mandates that facilities must “immediately”
call the state Division of Human Services to report an involuntary
transfer or discharge and submit physician documentation except when
transfer is to a hospital.
Timing for
notification of involuntary transfer and discharge also varies by
state. The federal regulations indicate that notice must be given 30
days in advance of an involuntary transfer or discharge. The following
states vary from the federal mandate, and in most of these less
notice is required than the Federal regulations state:
-
Arkansas and
Oklahoma require 10 days notice prior to involuntary transfer or
discharge,
-
Mississippi
requires two weeks notice.
- In
Louisiana,
15 days is allowable f the reason for the transfer is non-payment.
-
Illinois
requires 21 days notice before involuntary transfer or discharge.
-
Illinois
requires 21 days notice.
-
Maryland
actually requires 60 days notice if the facility is part of a
continuum of care community.
- Nebraska only
requires five days notice if the resident is transferring to a less
restrictive setting and ten days for overdue payments of five days
ore more.
Five states
(Illinois,
Indiana,
Iowa,
Michigan, and
Nebraska) require the use of
12-point type for a statement regarding the right to appeal within the
written notice of involuntary transfer or discharge. Illinois also
requires that a hearing request form with self-addressed stamped envelop
to the state Department of Human Services accompany the notice.
States also vary
with regard to bed holds after a transfer. For example:
- In
California,
residents or representatives must decide whether to hold their bed
within 24 hours of notification of transfer. Then, the bed must be
held for up to seven days.
- In
Iowa, the
decision must be made to hold the bed within 48 hours of transfer
notification.
-
Rhode Island
requires a bed hold decision within 24 hours of notice.
-
Illinois,
New
Hampshire, and
Vermont statutes indicate that beds must be held for
at least 10 days.
- In
Wisconsin,
the period for a bed hold is up to 15 days.
In its section on
transfers to other facilities,
Vermont
also embeds language related to internal transfers. The State requires
facilities to be financially liable for any charges associated with
internal transfers to other rooms within the facility, including charges
for disconnecting and reconnecting telephones and television cables.
Discharges and
Involuntary Transfers
[TOP]
Some states
(Arizona,
Delaware,
Illinois,
Indiana,
Iowa,
Maryland,
Michigan,
Missouri,
Montana,
New Hampshire, New York, Oklahoma,
Oregon,
Vermont,
Washington, and
Wisconsin) outline the specific process for appeals made
for involuntary transfers and discharges. These protocols are highly
detailed.
Some states are
detailed in requirements related to planning for involuntary transfers
and discharges.
-
Maine
mandates that residents discharged in need of home health care or
another nursing facility must be given a list of all licensed
providers with contact information that serve the area in which the
resident resides. Direct or indirect financial interests in these
providers must also be disclosed to the resident.
- In
New Jersey, transfer
policies must include provisions for transfer transportation and
security for the resident and personal belongings during transfer.
- Oklahoma
statutes indicate that an involuntary transfer can occur after the
interdisciplinary team has conducted a comprehensive assessment and
alternative measures to involuntary transfer/discharge have been
unsuccessful.
-
Wisconsin
statutes require a planning conference at least 14 days prior to
involuntary transfer or discharge to discuss the reason for
relocation, assess the effect of the relocation on the resident, and
to develop alternative plans. This conference must include the
resident, guardian, physician, any others designated by the resident
and if any, appropriate county agency. Voluntary transfers also
require a planning conference at least 7 days prior to transfer or
discharge.
- In West
Virginia, facilities are required to assist residents or their
representatives in finding an alternative placement in the case of
an involuntary discharge. Additionally, residents cannot be
transferred to a community setting against their will.
Residents must be fully informed of all of their options as well as
the right to refuse discharge.
[NHRegsComments: This provision, while respectful of
residents’ rights seems to run counter to the general trend to help
residents learn about community options. This language seems to
anticipate that transition counseling, which in some States is done
by relocation specialists rather than nursing home personnel, will
lead to discharges to the community against the residents’ will.]
- In
Oregon all residents and
their representatives transferring or discharging must receive a
copy of “Leaving the Nursing Facility.” Also the facility must
notify the county authority, usually the Area Agency on Aging,
responsible for long-term care assessment and allocation under the
Medicaid waivers.
- In
Georgia, If one spouse is being transferred, the other spouse
must be notified and transferred to that same place if he/she
requests. Spouses must be transferred on the same day "pending
availability of accommodations" and be allowed to be in the same
room if they wish.
Four states include
provisions for resident-requested discharge. The statutes in
Michigan simply delineate a
resident’s right to discharge one’s self from the nursing home.
North Dakota regulations
explicitly state that residents have the right to be discharged upon
written request after notification of the consequences of this decision
delineated by the attending physician.
Illinois also includes provisions for the right of the resident
to request discharge in writing to the administrator, physician, or
nurse. In
New Jersey, residents
may discharge themselves upon signing a waiver.
[NHRegsComments:
Although a resident’s right to leave a nursing home would appear to be
self evident if he or she is not adjudicated as incompetent, many
residents are unaware that they do have that option and perhaps
frontline staff are also unaware; therefore the clarifications seem
helpful, they
Some States have
counseling requirements prior to involuntary transfers or discharges.
Some of these requirements apply to the receiving facility as well as
the facility from which the resident is transferring.
-
Illinois
mandates that involuntary transfers must be discussed with the
resident, his/her representative, and the person or agency
responsible for care. This discussion must be documented in record
and counseling must be offered prior to the move),
-
Iowa
mandates counseling before and after a transfer by a licensed
psychologist, psychiatrist, social worker, or a person of resident’s
choosing. The receiving facility must immediately establish and
implement a plan to reduce the possible adverse effects of the
involuntary transfer or discharge.
Michigan also requires counseling before and after and
involuntary transfer. .
- When an
involuntary transfer is proposed in
Tennessee, the facility must consider the potential traumatic
effect on the resident, distance from the proposed facility to
resident’s family and friends, the ability of the receiving facility
to meet the resident’s medical needs, and compliance with state and
federal regulations. The transferring facility must also provide
counseling to resident, representative, and family to resolve issues
prior to transfer. .
[NHRegsComments, The references to the distance of the
proposed facility and the facility’s compliance with regulations are
unique to Tennessee.]
-
Wisconsin
regulations mandate that residents be afforded the opportunity to
visit the potential new facility at least once and the person’s
visit must include a meeting with administration unless medically
contraindicated or waived by resident.
[NHRegsComments. It would be interesting to study how
strictly this regulation is applied, including whether residents are
informed about their entitlement to visit possible receiving
facilities, and how often this right is waived. On the face of it,
this sounds like a good protection for residents.]
Oregon
has by far the most detailed regulations on admission, transfer, and
discharge rights. The regulations contain particularly elaborate
discussion of how to help prepare the resident for transfer, and they
give the resident the ultimate right to stay if transfer would be deemed
harmful. In Oregon, the facility shall not involuntarily transfer a
resident for medical or welfare reasons under the various reasons
outlined in its regulations if the risk of physical or emotional trauma
significantly outweighs the risk to the resident and/or to other
residents if no transfer were to occur, and the facility shall not
involuntarily transfer a resident for any other reasons if the transfer
presents a substantial risk of morbidity or mortality to the resident.
A section called “Considerations for Involuntary Transfer” includes many
resident-centered components, and safeguards. Prior to issuing a notice
for an involuntary transfer, in order to determine the appropriateness
of transfer, the facility shall consider the following: (1) the
availability of alternatives to transfer; (2) the resident's ties to
family and community; (3) the relationships the resident has developed
with other residents and facility staff; (4) the duration of the
resident's stay at the facility; (5) the medical needs of the resident
and the availability of medical services; (6) the age of the resident
and degree of physical and cognitive impairment; (7) the availability of
a receiving facility that would accept the resident and provide service
consistent with the resident's need for care. (8) the consistency of the
receiving facility's services with the activities and routine with which
the resident is familiar, and the receiving facility's ability to
provide the resident with similar access to personal items significant
to the resident and enjoyed by the resident at the transferring
facility; (9) the probability that the transfer would result in improved
or worsened mental, physical, or social functioning, or in reduced
dependency of the resident. (10) the type and amount of preparation for
the move, including but not limited to: (a) solicitation of the
resident's friends and/or family in preparing the resident for the move;
(b) Visitation by the resident to (prior to actual transfer) or
familiarity of the resident with the place to which the resident is to
be transferred; and (11) on-site consultation by an individual with
specific expertise in mental health services if the basis for
considering transfer is behavioral, e.g., gero-psychiatric consultation.
[NHRegComments: These considerations built into State rules
on discharge seem particularly resident-centered and also contain
practical ideas about how to consider whether a move would be difficult
for a resident and assist him/her to make transfers positive.]
Table Comparing States
[TOP]
Note: If the States in this table are not
hyper-linked, their provisions do not appear to address the topic, and
therefore, do not alter the Federal Regulatory scope. The
Table summarizes content on Administration by State (with a link to each
State's specific language).
Link to a downloadable PDF document
containing all State regulation on Admission, Transfer and Discharge at the bottom
of the Table.
|
483.12 Admission, Transfer and Discharge Rights |
|
State |
Goes
beyond
Federal
Regulations? |
Subjects
addressed: How State differs from or expands on Federal
Regulations |
|
Alabama |
Yes |
Ambulance requirements. |
|
Alaska |
Yes |
Transfer agreement with a hospital for emergency
care. |
|
Arizona |
Yes |
State-mandated resident transfer and
appeals process for those objecting to such a transfer. |
|
Arkansas |
Yes |
Discharge and transfer notices. Transfer agreement
with at least one hospital. |
|
California |
Yes |
Posted notice stating admission and discharge
policies are available upon request. Required use of California
standard admission form. Bed hold policies. |
|
Colorado |
Yes |
Ombudsman and resident to be notified in writing of
involuntary discharges. Appeal rights for involuntary
transfers, discharges, or moved to another room. |
|
Connecticut |
No |
Connecticut
does not include regulations on Admission, Transfer, and
Discharge Rights. |
|
Delaware |
Yes |
Transfer agreement with at least one hospital.
Hearing process to protest transfer or discharge. |
|
District of Columbia |
No |
District of
Columbia does not include regulations on Admission, Transfer, and
Discharge Rights. |
|
Florida |
No
|
Florida does
not include regulations on Admission, Transfer, and Discharge
Rights. |
|
Georgia |
Yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. Involuntary transfers of spouses who are both
residents. |
|
Hawaii |
Yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. |
|
Idaho |
Yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. |
|
Illinois |
Yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. Preadmission screening. Admission of residents under
age 65. Beds hold requirements. Involuntary transfers
notification and appeals; counseling procedures for planned
involuntary discharge. Resident right to be discharged if
he/she wishes. |
|
Indiana |
Yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. Preadmission screening. Approval for admission of
residents under age 18. Notifications to ombudsman & others of
involuntary transfers and discharges. Appeals process.
Responsibilities of receiving and sending facility, including
for resident’s belongings. |
|
Iowa |
Yes |
Bed-hold notification; approval for admission of
persons under age 16. Involuntary transfer notification;
counseling for those receiving involuntary transfer. Receiving
facility duties for involuntary transfer. |
|
Kansas |
Yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. No children under age 16 may be admitted. Admission
agreement specifications. |
|
Kentucky |
Yes |
Written transfer agreements with hospitals.
|
|
Louisiana |
Yes |
Advance notice of transfer.
|
|
Maine |
Yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. Referrals to home health on discharge & disclosure of
conflict of interest. Resident rights for representation &
self-representation in appeal of transfers. No admission until
PASSAR mental health & DD screens completed. |
|
Maryland |
Yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. Content of transfer agreement. Transfer and discharge
notices, including for CCRCs. Appeal and representation
rights. |
|
Massachusetts |
Yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. State approval for admissions of all residents under
age 22. The state medical review team must approve admissions
of all residents under age 22. |
|
Michigan |
Yes |
Financial agreements prior to admission. Process for
involuntary transfer and discharge. Counseling for residents
before and after involuntary transfer or discharge. Resident
right to be discharged if he/she wishes. |
|
Minnesota |
Yes |
Denial of admission. Financial agreements at
admission
|
|
Mississippi |
Yes |
Written financial
admission agreements. Notice before transfer or discharge.
|
|
Missouri |
Yes |
Written notice of transfer to resident, resident’s
representative, and at least one family member or (if no family
member) the State Ombudsman. Appeals process for involuntary
transfers or discharges. |
|
Montana |
Yes |
Appeals process for involuntary transfers or discharges.
Preadmission screening for all potential nursing home
residents. |
|
Nebraska |
Yes |
Times for written notice of transfer. Appeal rights
notice. |
|
Nevada |
Yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. |
|
New Hampshire |
Yes |
Appeal process for transfers or discharges.
Mandated 10-day minimum a bed hold. |
|
New Jersey |
Yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. Process for transfer, Limitations on discharges
between 5 p.m. and 8 a.m. Waiting list for admission. Rights
of CCRCs for preferential waiting list. Giving reasons for
admission refusal. Resident’s rights to discharge themselves.
|
|
New Mexico |
Yes |
Resident admissions to be 7 days a week. Procedures
for involuntary discharge of residents |
|
New York |
Yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. Procedure for appealing resident transfers and
discharges. |
|
North Carolina |
No |
North Carolina
does not include regulations on Admission, Transfer, and
Discharge Rights. |
|
North Dakota |
Yes |
A resident has the right to be
discharged upon written request and notification by the
attending physician of the consequences associated with such a
decision, |
|
Ohio |
No |
Ohio does not
include regulations on Admission, Transfer, and Discharge
Rights. |
|
Oklahoma |
Yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. Reasons for involuntary transfer. Notice of and
appeal of involuntary transfers & discharge. |
|
Oregon |
Yes |
Very detailed considerations for managing
involuntary transfer and prohibitions in some circumstances.
Readmission rights for those transferred involuntarily,
Notifications of transfer. Procedures for discharge and
informing community agencies. Rights of appeal of involuntary
transfer. Preadmission screening for all Medicaid eligible
residents. Private admission assessment for non-Medicaid
eligible potential residents to assure they are informed about
appropriate services and alternatives. |
|
Pennsylvania |
Yes |
Requires a
transfer agreement with at least one hospital. |
|
Rhode Island |
Yes |
Requires a
transfer agreement with at least one hospital. Bed hold
notices. |
|
South Carolina |
yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. |
|
South Dakota |
yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. |
|
Tennessee |
yes |
Children under 14 may not be admitted except when
approved by the state. Considerations before proposing an
involuntary transfer. Counseling prior to involuntary
transfer. Notifications prior to a non-emergency involuntary
transfer. |
|
Texas |
Yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. Notification of State regarding involuntary transfer
except to hospital. Submission of physician documentation when
transferred to hospital. Preadmission screening for all new
admissions of residents. |
|
Utah |
No |
Utah does not
include regulations on Admission, Transfer, and Discharge Rights
|
|
Vermont |
Yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. Bed holds. Resident transfers mandated if there is a
court order. Process for involuntary transfers or discharges.
Facility responsibility for charges incurred due to relocations
within the facility. Mandatory options counseling for those
being admitted to a facility. |
|
Virginia |
No |
Virginia does
not include regulations on Admission, Transfer, and Discharge
Rights. |
|
Washington |
yes |
Wait list for admission. Circumstances when nursing
homes can give admission preference. Appeals process for
involuntary transfers or discharges. |
|
West Virginia |
yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. Facility to assist finding an appropriate alternative
for involuntary transfers. Non-Medicaid residents must pay bed
hold rate prior to readmission. Residents must not be
transferred to a community setting against their will and must
be informed of all of their options, including the right to
refuse discharge. |
|
Wisconsin |
Yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. Process before discharge for involuntary transfers or
discharges. Process before discharges when transfer is
voluntary. Includes counseling and at least one visit to
potential alternative placements. Appeals process for
involuntary transfers. The state must approve of admissions for
persons under age 18. Admissions occur 7 days a week. Bed hold
rules. |
|
Wyoming |
yes |
Requires a transfer agreement with at least one
hospital. |
[TOP]
|