| |
Seminar Series
2000 - 2001
The
Health Services Research Seminars feature nationally and
internationally known leaders in health services research speak on
current topics. These seminars are free and open to the public.
2000-2001 Schedule
| Date |
Presenter |
Title |
April 2, 2001 |
Roger Battistella, Professor of Health
Policy and Management, Sloan Graduate Program in Health
Services Administration, Department of Policy Analysis and
Management, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University |
The Health Insurance Defined-Contribution
Movement: Whether Vouchers or Medical Savings Accounts
Abstract |
| March 16, 2001 |
David Cutler, John L. Loeb Professor of
Social Sciences in the Department of Economics at Harvard
University, Faculty member in the Kennedy School of
Government, Research Associate at the National Bureau of
Economic Research, Editor, Journal of Health Economics |
Why Are Americans Healthier Than They Used
to Be [and Who Cares]?
Abstract |
| February 14, 2001 |
David H. Gustafson, Robert A Rather
Professor of Industrial Engineering, Professor in Preventive
Medicine, Founding Director of the Center for Health Systems
Research and Analysis, University of Wisconsin-Madison |
The Internet Revolution And Healthcare: Ten
Years Of Research On Consumer Health Informatics
Abstract |
| October 26, 2000 |
A Symposium on Cost Effectiveness and
Medical Technology: Frank Sloan, PhD, J. Alexander McMahon
Professor of Health Policy and Management and Professor of
Economics, Duke University; Mark McClellan, MD, PhD,
Professor of Economics, Stanford University; Susan Foote,
JD, Division Head, Health Policy and Management, School of
Public Health |
Abstract |
Archives
2005-2006 |
2004-2005 |
2003-2004 |
2002-2003 |
2001-2002 |
2000-2001 |
1999-2000 |
1998-1999
Abstracts for HSR Series
Roger Battistella
Professor of Health Policy and Management, Sloan Graduate
Program in Health Services Administration, Department of Policy
Analysis and Management, College of Human Ecology, Cornell
University “The Health Insurance Defined-Contribution
Movement: Whether Vouchers or Medical Savings Accounts” Abstract
An inability to stem inflationary spending is causing major health
care purchasers, employers and government, to re-examine the
conventional wisdom shaping the way most Americans receive health
insurance. Frustration over the failure to control spending is
motivating health care purchasers to consider the advantages of
providing health insurance on a defined contribution basis. In
deciding between vouchers and medical savings accounts as the
instrument for a defined benefit strategy, purchasers, for reasons
of simplicity and political acceptability, disproportionately will
be drawn to vouchers. However, the position taken in this
presentation is that, although more controversial, medical savings
accounts better serve the public interest because they do more to
encourage sustainable long-term savings by giving individuals a
powerful financial incentive to assume a vigilant partnership role
in cost containment.
Professor Battistella is a nationally recognized policy scholar who
has published extensively in all of the leading journals in his
field on subjects involving the organization and financing of health
services, managed care and health management education. He has
extensive international experience, both as a consultant and
visiting scholar in a large number of countries. Professor
Battistella has been on the faculty of Cornell University's Sloan
Graduate Program in Health Policy and Management continuously since
the completion of doctoral studies from the University of Michigan
in the mid 1960s. For many years he directed the Sloan Program,
during which time the program was moved from the Business School to
the College of Human Ecology where it now is a component of the
Department of Policy Analysis and Management.
Top
David Cutler
John L. Loeb Professor of Social Sciences in the Department of
Economics at Harvard University, Faculty member in the Kennedy
School of Government, Research Associate at the National Bureau of
Economic Research, Editor, Journal of Health Economics “Why
Are Americans Healthier Than They Used to Be [and Who Cares]?”
Abstract Since 1950, life expectancy at birth has increased
by nearly 10 years, and life expectancy at age 65 has increased by
nearly 4 years. In addition to living longer, people are healthier
at any age than they used to be. Why has health improved so greatly?
What are the implications of this change for society and public
policy? This talk, the subject of the book Dr. Cutler is writing
this year, will consider these questions. He shows that health
improvements result from several factors: high-tech medical
interventions; low-tech pharmaceuticals; and behavioral change
leading to healthier lives. Underlying each of these factors is a
common theme: people value their health highly, and are willing to
pay significant amounts, financial or psychic, to be in better
health. These findings have important consequences for several
issues: the amount of money optimally spent on health care; the
length of the working life; and the failure of 'managed care' to
meet peoples' expectations.
Dr. Cutler has served as a Senior Staff Economist at the Council
of Economic of Advisers and Director of the National Economic
Council. David research concentrates in health economics including
explanations for increasing health costs, the effect of managed care
on medical outcomes,; and measuring the productivity of the medical
sector. He is currently on sabbatical at the Center for Advanced
Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University where he is
working on the book that his presentation will be part of.
Top
David H. Gustafson
Robert A Rather Professor of Industrial Engineering, Professor in
Preventive Medicine, Founding Director of the Center for Health
Systems Research and Analysis, University of Wisconsin-Madison “The
Internet Revolution And Healthcare: Ten Years Of Research On
Consumer Health Informatics” Abstract
This presentation will describe the state of the field of consumer
health informatics and give an overview of one extensively studied
system (CHESS-the Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System)
as an example of how systems, such as this one, can influence health
and health care. Top
A Symposium on Cost Effectiveness and
Medical Technology Frank Sloan, PhD, J. Alexander
McMahon Professor of Health Policy and Management and Professor of
Economics, Duke University Mark McClellan, MD, PhD,
Professor of Economics, Stanford University Susan Foote, JD,
Division Head, Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health Abstract
The demand for accountability in health care has led to interest in
evaluating new technologies on the basis of cost effectiveness and
cost benefit analyses as traditional criteria such as efficacy. The
use of cost effectiveness for evaluating new medical technologies is
being explored by the Health Care Financing Administration and is
subject to significant debate, particularly concerning its effect on
the development of medical technology. This symposium is designed to
explore some of the issues related the use of cost effectiveness
analyses. Professor Sloan is a nationally recognized expert in cost
effectiveness. As well as doing cost effectiveness analyses, he has
studied how cost effectiveness analyses have been used in making
coverage decisions by health care organizations. Professor McClellan
is recognized for his work using cost benefit analyses and analysis
of technological change, particularly for care related to heart
attacks. Dr. Foote is recognized for her expertise on the policy
process surrounding coverage decisions. Some of the issues the
symposium will focus on include
- cost effectiveness analysis methodology and uses in health care
decision-making
- the evolution of the field of medical technology assessment,
- role of public and private entities in assessment activities,
- evolution of cost-effectiveness as a concept/development of
pharmacoeconomics as a field and the absence of equivalent attention
to economics in the device area,
- the divergence between theory and practice/ the evolution of the
field and ability to measure cost effectiveness versus the
controversies that cost effectiveness that has raised in the public
and private sectors, with particular attention to the Medicare
program.
Top |
|