NH Regulations Plus
One Stop |Directories | Search U of M

Quality of Care

 

 

Federal Regulations sections & related F-tags

F310(1) - F312(3)  Activities of daily living

F313(b)  Vision and hearing

F314(c)  Pressure sores

F315(1) - F316(2)  Urinary incontinence

F317(1) - F318(2)  Range of motion

F319(1) - F320(2)  Mental and psychosocial

                           functioning

F321(g) - F322(2)  Naso-gastric Tubes

F323(1) - F324(2)  Accidents

F325(1) - F326(2)  Nutrition

F327(j)  Hydration

F328(k)  Special Needs

F329(i) - F331(ii)  Unnecessary drugs

F332(1) - F333(2)  Medication errors

Description of Federal Requirements  [TOP]

Under 483.25, each resident must receive and the facility must provide “the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological well-being, in accordance with the resident’s comprehensive assessment and plan of care.”

Among the specific components, the facility shall ensure (a) that the resident's ability to perform activities of daily living do not diminish, unless unavoidable, and those who cannot carry out those activities receive necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal oral hygiene;  (b) residents receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision and hearing, and assistance with necessary appointments and transportation to see specialists in these fields; (c) that a resident who is admitted without pressure sores does not develop them unless it is unavoidable, and a resident with pressure sores receives the necessary treatment to promote healing, prevent infections, and new sores; (d) that a resident admitted without a urinary catheter not receive one unless it is unavoidable, and that residents who are incontinent of bladder receive services to prevent urinary infections and restore as much bladder function as possible; (e) that residents who are admitted without limited range of motion do not experience reductions in range of motion unless unavoidable, and that resident with a limited range of motion receive treatment to increase those abilities and prevent further deterioration; (f) that residents who displays mental or psychosocial adjustment difficulties receive appropriate treatment to correct the assessed problem, and that a resident whose initial assessment did not reveal such a problem does not show decreased social interaction or increased withdrawn, angry, or depressive behaviors, unless such deterioration was deemed unavoidable because of the clinical condition; (g) that a resident admitted without a nasogastric feeding tube not be fed through such a tube, unless deemed necessary, and that a resident with a feeding tube receive appropriate treatment and services to prevent aspiration pneumonia, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic disorders, and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers, and that afford be mode to restore normal feeding skills; (h) that the environment be as free of hazards as possible, and each resident receives supervision and assistive devices so as to prevent accidents; (i) that the resident maintain acceptable parameters of nutrition status such as body weight and protein levels, unless his or her physical condition makes that impossible, and that the resident receives a therapeutic diet when it is indicated; and (j) that the resident receive sufficient fluids to maintain hydration and health.  Each of these regulations follows a similar pattern: first, stating that if the resident is admitted without a particular problem, he or she should not develop it unless the clinical condition makes it unavoidable; but that if the resident has or develops the problem, the treatment should prevent complications and attempt to restore the original function.

In addition, the residents should (k) receive proper treatment for special needs and services, which include: injections; parenteral and enteral fluids; colostomy, ureterostomy, or ileostomy care; tracheostomy care; tracheal suctioning; respiratory care; foot care; and prostheses. 

Under (l), the resident should be free of unnecessary drugs, defined as excessive doses, excessive duration, drugs not indicated, or drugs with adverse consequences.  If residents are admitted without antipsychotic drugs, they should not be started unless necessary to treat a specific condition, and residents who receive antipsychotic drugs should receive gradual reductions and behavioral therapy in an effort to discontinue those drugs.  Under (m), the facility must ensure that the resident be free of medication errors, and that the medication error rate in the facility be 5% or less. 

The regulation on Resident Assessment, 483.20, is related to the Quality of Care regulation in that many of the expectations in the latter are reinforced by the areas for assessment and planning contained within the Resident Assessment rule. 

Comparison of State Requirements  [TOP]
 

Using the sections on Comparisons of State Regulations

a Each narrative highlights how States differ from Federal regulations on a specific topic. 
a
Italics are used for signed NHRegsPlus comments on the relevance of these variations for resident autonomy, quality
     of life, or culture change. 

a
Examples are illustrative not comprehensive; always check specific State language. 
a
See a table with links to each State’s regulatory language at the bottom of the page.

 
Federal regulations address Quality of Care as a separate category, as do several of the states.  Many states are silent on this category – at this time, nothing in excess of the Federal regulations is mandated (Alaska, New Mexico).  Others address Quality of Care matters directly, most often as a subsection of their nursing regulations (California, Tennessee); a few others make nominal references in a more indirect way in other sections of their regulations (Pennsylvania).

Quality of Care standards, as outlined in the Federal regulations, include only what might be termed “the basics” that really apply to everyone, whether a nursing home resident or not:  Bathing, grooming, eating, drinking, toileting, walking (and other movement), accident prevention, and minimum standards to maintain physical health (catheter, tube and ostomy cares; monitoring for infection; over-medication prevention).   States with a more comprehensive approach and/or a wider scope than the Federal regulations require tend to focus on the nursing procedures that support the delivery of quality care (Idaho, Wyoming).

Trends specific to this category are not yet apparent, as they are not reflected statutorily or, in many cases, as their own category.  Much of what encompasses a “total” concept of Quality of Care is reflected in or derived from other regulatory categories, such as Nursing Services, Dietary Services, and Resident Rights.

[Summarized: April 2006]

Table Comparing States  [TOP]

Note: If the States in this table are not hyper-linked, their provisions do not appear to address the topic, and therefore, do not alter the Federal Regulatory scope.  The Table summarizes content on Administration by State (with a link to each State's specific language).  Link to a downloadable PDF containing  all State regulation on Administration is at the bottom of the Table.
 

483.25 Quality of Care
State
Goes beyond Federal Regulations?
Subjects Addressed
Alabama
Yes
Alabama regulations closely match the Federal categories
Alaska
No
Alaska does not address Quality of Care in its nursing home regulations
Arizona
No
Arizona does not address Quality of Care in its nursing home regulations
Arkansas
No
Arkansas does not address Quality of Care in its nursing home regulations
California
Yes
Nursing Service - Patient Care
Colorado
Yes
Accident Prevention and Attention; Behavior Problem Care; Contracture Care; Weight Changes; Grooming
Connecticut
No
Colorado does not address Quality of Care in its nursing home regulations
Delaware    
District of Columbia    
Florida
No
Florida does not address Quality of Care in its nursing home regulations
Georgia
Yes
Rehabilitative Nursing
Hawaii
No
Hawaii does not address Quality of Care in its nursing home regulations
Idaho
Yes
Nursing Services
Illinois
Yes
Nursing Services; Psychotropic Medication
Indiana
Yes
Activities of Daily Living - Detailed; Deficiencies
Iowa
Yes
Required Nursing Services; Medication and Treatment
Kansas
Yes
Kansas regulations closely match the Federal categories
Kentucky
Yes
Kentucky regulations closely match the Federal categories
Louisiana
Yes
Nursing Care; Restraints
Maine
Yes
Personal Care; Dietary Practices; Restorative Nursing
Maryland
No
Maryland does not address Quality of Care in its nursing home regulations
Massachusetts
 
 
Michigan
No
Michigan does not address Quality of Care in its nursing home regulations
Minnesota
Yes
Rehabilitation Nursing Care; Medication Errors
Mississippi
Yes
Service Beyond Capability of the Home
Missouri
No
Missouri does not address Quality of Care in its nursing home regulations
Montana
 
 
Nebraska
Yes
Provision of Care and Treatment; Maintenance or Improvement in Abilities; Inability to Self-Perform; Promote Healing; Provision of Activities; Food Service; Unplanned Weight Loss
Nevada
Yes
Nevada regulations closely match the Federal categories
New Hampshire
 
Analysis Pending
New Jersey
Yes
Mandatory Quality of Care Services; Mandatory General Resident Services; Mandatory Pharmacy Reporting Policies and Procedures
New Mexico
No
New Mexico does not address Quality of Care in its nursing home regulations
New York
Yes
Nutritional Therapy; Antipsychotic Drugs
North Carolina
Yes
Restraints
North Dakota
No
North Dakota does not address Quality of Care in its nursing home regulations
Ohio
No
Ohio does not address Quality of Care in its nursing home regulations
Oklahoma
Yes
Nursing and Personal Care Services; Rehabilitative or Restorative Nursing Services
Oregon
Yes
Nursing Services Generally; Problem Resolution and Prevention; Safe Environment
Pennsylvania
Yes
Policies
Rhode Island
Yes
Selected Nursing Care Procedures; Administration of Drugs; Administration of Drugs by Non-Licensed Personnel
South Carolina
Yes
Resident Care Statements
South Dakota
No
South Dakota does not address Quality of Care in its nursing home regulations
Tennessee
No
Tennessee does not address Quality of Care in its nursing home regulations
Texas
Yes
Texas regulations closely match the Federal categories
Utah
Yes
Utah regulations closely match the Federal categories
Vermont
Yes
Vermont regulations closely match the Federal categories
Virginia
Yes
Nursing Services
Washington
Yes
Washington regulations closely match the Federal categories; Controlled Drugs Policy
West Virginia
Yes
Accident Reporting; Controlled Drugs Policy
Wisconsin
No
Wisconsin does not address Quality of Care in its nursing home regulations
Wyoming
Yes
Nursing Services; Dietary Supervision

 

 


[TOP]

[Back to Top of Table]

Complete Transcript of State Regulations on Quality of Care 

 
In this website, state and federal regulations are dated from the time they were extracted. Please consult the relevant state office for updates.
Summaries of regulations and regulatory processes are the work of project staff and do not reflect official positions of any federal or state agencies.
© Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. Trouble seeing the text? | Contact U of M | Privacy
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Last modified on August 22, 2008